Boost logo

Boost :

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-14 14:31:47

My apologies - please, just forget what I've posted.

> no_overload_tag function( \
> , any BOOST_PP_INTERCEPT)...); \

GCC allows this for binary operators (even in ansi mode), making me jump
to conclusions - couldn't find anything in the standard backing it.

Further I doubt there is a chance of weakening the "no-match-overload"
in any other way to match worse than a function with one user defined
conversion per argument.

Sorry for that !

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at