[boost] Re: Proposal for 'is_dereferenceable' and other templatemetafunctions

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-14 14:31:47

My apologies - please, just forget what I've posted.

> no_overload_tag function( \
>   BOOST_PP_ENUM_PARAMS(BOOST_PP_DEC(arity) \
>                       , any BOOST_PP_INTERCEPT)...);  \

GCC allows this for binary operators (even in ansi mode), making me jump 
to conclusions - couldn't find anything in the standard backing it.

Further I doubt there is a chance of weakening the "no-match-overload" 
in any other way to match worse than a function with one user defined 
conversion per argument.

Sorry for that !