Re: [boost] Re: Aaron's Informal Proposal for a Universal Demultiplexor for Boost

From: Aaron W. LaFramboise (aaronrabiddog51_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-14 15:32:06

Carlo Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:12:57AM +0000, Tommy wrote:
>>I'm confused regarding the use of the terms multiplexor and demultiplexor. I 
>>hope you mean demultiplexor when you say multiplexor - right?
> 
> This is what I assumed, but he has a point here.  You (Aaron) propose a
> class basic_multiplexor, shouldn't that be basic_demultiplexor?

Yes.  However, the difference between a demultiplexor and multiplexor is
not entirely obvious to me in this context.  (We could invent one, if it
 were valuable, but I don't think it is).  I just like short names. :)

Aaron W. LaFramboise