From: Aaron W. LaFramboise (aaronrabiddog51_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-14 15:32:06
Carlo Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:12:57AM +0000, Tommy wrote:
>>I'm confused regarding the use of the terms multiplexor and demultiplexor. I
>>hope you mean demultiplexor when you say multiplexor - right?
> This is what I assumed, but he has a point here. You (Aaron) propose a
> class basic_multiplexor, shouldn't that be basic_demultiplexor?
Yes. However, the difference between a demultiplexor and multiplexor is
not entirely obvious to me in this context. (We could invent one, if it
were valuable, but I don't think it is). I just like short names. :)
Aaron W. LaFramboise
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk