[boost] Re: Rationale for library name convention [Was: Dot in Boost Library Names?]

From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-15 08:57:37

David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
> These are not C++ identifiers; they're names.

To me, this isn't a very good rationale but since we're already discussing that 
dreaded bicycle shed I won't argue any further ;-).

Regards,

Andreas