From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-15 11:33:05
On Sep 15, 2004, at 9:16 AM, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> John Maddock writes:
>> I've made a set of summaries for BSL conformance available at
>> There's one summary per library + one for all of Boost, I'd encourage
>> everyone to take a look to see whether their work can be used under
>> the BSL
>> alone, or if there are non-BSL dependencies that they rely upon.
> First of all, thank you for your work on this!
> Question: is there a reason why we cannot automatically convert all
> "Boost Software License, Version 1.0 (variant #N)" to the canonical
It's almost trivial to do with bcp. A few minutes hacking in
$BOOST_ROOT/tools/bcp/scan_licence.cpp should do the trick; just detect
the case where is_non_bsl_license is false but the license index isn't
the canonical version of the license.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk