From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-15 13:09:39
"Doug Gregor" <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| On Sep 15, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
| > Given the framework in boost.range these would be absolutely *trivial*
| > to add.
| > 1st vote: for or against adding these?
| Against. If the C++ committee likes them, we can add them into a later
| revision of Boost.
Ok, but doesn't it usually work the way that things go into boost first? If
not for anything else, then to
see if the stuff works in practice?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk