From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-15 16:12:01
David Abrahams wrote:
> Daniel Wallin wrote:
>> I wrote something like this, that has the upshot of being safe. ;)
> The trick would be to get it to return a const lvalue when you pass a
> const rvalue ;-)
Ah yes, and to do that you need to help with the overload resolution.
Like you did in mentioned thread, right?
-- Daniel Wallin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk