Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-15 20:18:32

Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:

> At the risk of discussing the bicycle shed, what about using the
> scope resolution operator? That, at least, would not be
> misconstrued by a copyeditor and would be in keeping with C++
> syntax.

IMO it's very important to distinguish those things that are supposed
to have meaning in code from those that are not. Using strongly
C++-like syntax here would be confusing, since these things are not

> Should that be rejected soundly, here's my vote on the period:
> Never: -1
> Always Except Before Library: 0
> Always: 1
> --
> Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden]
> Software Engineer
> Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at