From: Ben Hutchings (ben.hutchings_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-16 09:11:06
Paul A Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> PS The query was about an item which failed to compile using 8.0
> (OK with 7.1)
> template<typename T, typename BigT>
> out_sqr(ostream& os, T x, BigT temp)
> temp = x * x;
> os << temp;
> Bray says that this is because the implicit function return type is
This is a non-standard extension for compatibility with a predecessor
of C that was replaced over 30 years ago. It appals me that any
current C++ compiler still supports it.
> I assumed that the implicit function return type was void,
> and indeed if void is added, it works as expected.
C++ does not allow the return type to be implicit, and when it was
allowed in C (prior to the 1999 standard) it was int.
> Can anyone who has digested the Standard quote chapter and verse on
You're kidding, right?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk