Re: [boost] FORMAL Review of "Output Formatter" library - 7 days left

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-17 06:22:50

Reece Dunn wrote:

> John Torjo wrote:
> 
>> Hi Reece,
>>
>> Maybe you can show more about this after the review is over.
>> It's good that boosters now know you've already started to improve the 
>> lib based on feedback, but for now, I think it's better for them to 
>> focus feedback on the existing lib:
>> http://www.torjo.com/code/outfmt.zip
>>
>> Or maybe I'm just plain wrong ;)
> 
> 
> Sure. There has been some great feedback thus far. I just wanted to let 
> boosters know the direction I am taking, WRT naming and other areas 
> (like adding support for setting decorators on the stream like Dave 
> suggested).
> 
Totally ok then.

Best,
John

-- 
John Torjo
-- john_at_[hidden]
Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
-- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all
-- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/
-- v1.4.0 - save_dlg - true binding of your data to UI controls!
    + easily add validation rules (win32gui/examples/smart_dlg)