From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-19 10:29:35
Jeff Garland writes:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:01:01 -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote
> > A clarification for developers monitoring regression reports: a
> > significant number of Linux regressions showing up in the current
> > reports
> So 'regressions' against 1.31 now show up as 'red' boxes?
> > (http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-
> > regression/developer/summary.html) is NOT a result of some recent
> > checkin. Most of these failures were there for some time, but
> > weren't highlighted as regressions because the report generation
> > tools didn't have the data for this platform to compare against.
> > This was fixed yesterday.
> Some of the date-time failures with gcc2.95 appear to be a runtime
> configuration issue:
> Run output :
> error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.3-2.so.3: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
That was my guess as well; Martin had the following to say, though:
I don't think it is a configuration issue here.
The library does exist at its default location:
> ll /usr/local/gcc-2.95.3/lib/
drwxr-xr-x 3 m m 280 May 27 2003 ./
drwxr-xr-x 9 m root 240 May 27 2003 ../
drwxr-xr-x 3 m m 88 May 27 2003 gcc-lib/
-rw-r--r-- 1 m m 370370 May 27 2003 libiberty.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 m m 2462378 May 27 2003 libstdc++-3-libc6.3-2-2.10.0.a
-r-xr-xr-x 1 m m 1307235 May 27 2003 libstdc++-3-libc6.3-2-2.10.0.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 m m 30 May 27 2003 libstdc++-libc6.3-2.a.3 ->
lrwxrwxrwx 1 m m 31 May 27 2003 libstdc++-libc6.3-2.so.3 ->
There was a report on the jamboost list about similar
problems at another site. I can't recall whether a bug
was found or fixed.
Any pointers on how to track this down will be greatly appreciated.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk