From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-19 13:37:07
Beman Dawes wrote:
> >Just wanted to mention here, that I've used const_string as
> a plug in
> >replacement for std::string for my Wave library and
> succeeded without any
> >further problems. Moreover, the const_string class gave a
> >of about 20% if compared to the flex_string and about 100%
> if compared to
> >the std::string (I can provide the concrete numbers, if somebody is
> >interested). But these numbers certainly very specific to
> Wave and its
> 100% gets my attention, that's for sure!
> Could you give a small example of a typical usage or two? I'd
> like to form
> an opinion as to how common the usage is likely to be.
I've simply used the const_string class instead of the
std::string/flex_string classes. The const_string class exposes a
std::string compatible interface (sans the modifying member functions,
certainly), so this was possible without problems.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk