[boost] Re: Simplified failures markup notation (Was: explicite failures question)

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-20 01:39:11

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

> Vladimir Prus writes:
>> I'd much prefer something like
>>
>> <mark-expected-failures>
>>      <test name="cmdline_test_dll"/>
>>      <test name="parsers_test_dll"/>
>>      <toolset name="cw8-3"/>
>>      <toolset name="comeau"/>
>> </mark-expected-failures>
> 
> Implemented in CVS now. See MPL markup section in
> "status/explicit-failures-markup.xml" for specific examples.

Thanks. However, I've noticed that all 'mark-expected-failures' elements
must appear after all 'test' elements, otherwise
http://apps.gotdotnet.com/xmltools/xsdvalidator/ will report validation
error.

Am I right that xs:sequence requires specific order of child elements? Is
there any way around it?

- Volodya