From: Maxim Yegorushkin (e-maxim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-21 02:07:08
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Maxim Yegorushkin wrote:
>> Here is the link: http://conststring.sourceforge.net/
> "The mutability of std::basic_string<> and its interface do not allow
> implementers to make it a lightweight value object with cheap copy
> operation through string representation sharing and copy-on-write
> technique while maintaining thread safety."
> This claim borders on blatant FUD. Claims to the extent that std::
> string is sorta "less thread-safe then char" don't hold water
> because there isn't non-const overload of operator for char.
> Or am I just missing something?
May be the quoted statement is not clear, but it states that a COW
std::string can not be made thread safe due to its interface.
A good discussion of the subject you can find here:
-- Maxim Yegorushkin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk