From: Michael Stevens (Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-24 10:06:45
> After one day and one night of investigation, I think (!) I've finally
> managed to make bjam report correct results for my regressions.
Your perseverance is much appreciated.
> The results for CW-9.3 seem to be correct now and thus there should be
> some more failing test cases for this toolset now.
I have fixed the compilation problem with uBLAS you reported. So I was looking
forward to seeing the results. Now I see the runtime errors so there is still
work to be done!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk