[boost] Re: CW 9.3 results (or lack thereof) - current state

From: Michael Stevens (Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-24 10:06:45

Stefan,

> After one day and one night of investigation, I think (!) I've finally 
> managed to make bjam report correct results for my regressions.
Your perseverance is much appreciated. 

> The results for CW-9.3 seem to be correct now and thus there should be 
> some more failing test cases for this toolset now.

I have fixed the compilation problem with uBLAS you reported. So I was looking 
forward to seeing the results. Now I see the runtime errors so there is still 
work to be done!

Thanks,
        Michael