From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-24 14:37:49
Cromwell Enage <sponage_at_[hidden]> writes:
> --- Ian McCulloch <ianmcc_at_[hidden]>
>> Is the following program supposed to compile with
>> the new MPL?
> Probably not.
>> But, maybe I was mis-using equal_to ?
> equal_to<...> no longer accepts bool_<...> or any
> expressions resulting in bool_<...> as a template
> argument, since bool_<...> does not contain a typedef
> named tag (for numeric_cast<...>). I don't have the
> MPL book, so I don't know the rationale behind it
Unfortunately, that bit isn't covered in the book. I think Aleksey
added the tag stuff very recently as a way of handling non-integral
numeric types. It seems to me that bool_ really ought to have
whatever tags int_ has.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk