[boost] Re: [shared_ptr] Interlocked* - possible bug?

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-25 07:07:20

John Torjo wrote:
[...]
> // here - you need InterlockedCompareExchange
> // to realize that refcount is 0 (zero)
> shared_ptr<test> p3 = weak.lock();

lock() calls InterlockedCompareExchange (too bad it's fully fenced) 
if refcount isn't 0. Again, it can't see "false" zero.

regards,
alexander.