[boost] Re: [Optional] Borland failures

From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-27 07:26:23

"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:m265617c8o.fsf_at_meta-comm.com...
>
> Could somebody who cares about Borland take a look/comment of these
> two:

I don't have BCB anymore so I'm just guessing.

>
>      http://tinyurl.com/5uw9x
>
Fixed.
This one was easy, there was a macro switch for Borland in the header file
which was not used in the test file.

>      http://tinyurl.com/6jse9
>
Probably fixed too, but I can't tell.

The problem is that BCB5.6.4 accepts:

short v = 1 ;
short& rv = 2 ;
int& ri = rv ; // Temporary created here

I just changed the "short" for "double" in the hope that being a narrowing
conversion it won't do it.

Thanks

Fernando Cacciola
SciSoft