From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-27 07:26:23
"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> Could somebody who cares about Borland take a look/comment of these
I don't have BCB anymore so I'm just guessing.
This one was easy, there was a macro switch for Borland in the header file
which was not used in the test file.
Probably fixed too, but I can't tell.
The problem is that BCB5.6.4 accepts:
short v = 1 ;
short& rv = 2 ;
int& ri = rv ; // Temporary created here
I just changed the "short" for "double" in the hope that being a narrowing
conversion it won't do it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk