From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-27 11:07:30
On Sep 27, 2004, at 10:20 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I also anticipate C++0X will contain some really slick
>> indirect_iterator types that will transform
>> container<sole_ptr<T>>::iterator appropriately. These will likely
>> be heavily influenced by (if not based on) the Boost.Iterator
> Not if nobody else fights for that library in the LWG.
> pessimistic-ly y'rs,
I wouldn't be so pessimistic. I don't believe a single member of the
lwg expressed the opinion that we didn't want it in C++0X. It is clear
we want something like the boost iterator library. It isn't clear
/exactly/ what we want. It's a complicated area, that's all.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk