From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-27 15:19:20
>Roland Richter wrote:
> John Torjo wrote:
>> The dilemma I see is that the outfmt library is somewhere between
>> serialization (boost::serialization) and pretty-printing
>> (boost::format). IMO, outfmt provides *both* at a basic level in that
>> it simply adds streaming operators << and >> to STL containers,
>> which, for some reason, are currently missing.
What advantages does using the output formatters for output/input have over
using the serialization library to do the same thing?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk