Re: [boost] [uBLAS] Linux regressions

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 03:32:55

Martin Wille writes:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>> uBLAS "test2" currently fails with most of Linux toolsets, and it
>> used to pass in the previous release --
>> http://tinyurl.com/3vmlv. Does anybody has any idea what's up here?
>
> Possibly stale results. I'll remove all ublas results
> before the next run.

Looks better now, although "test1" still fails at run-time with GCC >
2.95 and <= 3.3.3. Any uBLAS developers would like to comment on this?

Also, it looks like we have the missing cells problem with
"test2" and gcc-2.95.3-linux/intel-7.1-linux. Martin, if you could
once again upload the bjam log to us, we'd appreciate it.

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering