From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 07:04:32
"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> "Fernando Cacciola"wrote:
> > > I tried some simple ways to work it around but
> > > it would likely require changes in optional inheritance
> > > structure.
> > >
> > Oh, well, we can discuss them.
> > Maybe I can put them in _after_ the release.
> I think now the test should be labeled
> as expected fail.
> Its question whether to invest time on
> big changes for oudated compiler
> for rather rare situation. This problem
> (+ warning) happened few times for me
> and it was rather easy to see there's
> problem with my code.
I'll see how to mark the test as expected to fail (never done that before)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk