[boost] Re: [Optional] Borland failures

From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-28 07:04:32

"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:cjb52k$5qp$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
>
> "Fernando Cacciola"wrote:
>
> > > I tried some simple ways to work it around but
> > > it would likely require changes in optional inheritance
> > > structure.
> > >
> > Oh, well, we can discuss them.
> > Maybe I can put them in _after_ the release.
> >
> I think now the test should be labeled
> as expected fail.
>
> Its question whether to invest time on
> big changes for oudated compiler
> for rather rare situation. This problem
> (+ warning) happened few times for me
> and it was rather easy to see there's
> problem with my code.
>
Good point.
I'll see how to mark the test as expected to fail (never done that before)

Fernando Cacciola
SciSoft