Boost logo

Boost :

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 09:19:55

[Moving to the Boost list only]

On Sep 29, 2004, at 9:07 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> Hi Doug,
>> Vladimir,
>> You'd regenerated the bison/flex output after 1.31.0, which has caused
>> both this problem and the regression noted by Jeffrey Holle on the
>> users list yesterday. Perhaps we should revert this directory to its
>> 1.31.0 state.
> It's not so easy :-( I've regenerated the files as part of this commit:
> 2004-01-26 12:16 vladimir_prus
> * graphviz_digraph_parser.cpp, graphviz_graph_parser.cpp,
> graphviz_parser.yy: Fix (or rather workaround) the bug which
> caused
> second reading of graphviz file to fail. Looks like the parser
> is
> not reenterant.
> Patch from anynymous user.
> so if we revert the files back, we'll introduce back a bug.


> I've just
> regenerated the files again and Jeffrey's problem is gone. Guess we'd
> need to
> #define YY_NO_UNISTD_H
> to fix the other problem. I've added that to Jamfile and the files
> seems to
> still build.
> Should I commit the regenerated files and Jamfile changes?

Sure. Were you able to check it on VC 7.1?

>> We'll deprecate it in 1.32.0 (when, hopefully, we will
>> have a new GraphViz parser that works well) and remove it afterwards.
> How the new parser will be implemented?

Spirit. Granted, they've dropped support for older, broken compilers,
so someone will still be getting hurt by this.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at