Re: [boost] re: [Thread] The last step

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-02 14:05:29

Michael Stevens writes:
> On Friday 01 October 2004 15:32, "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> 
> wrote:
>
>> You can probably guess what I'm about to ask -- can we do something
>> about Intel 8.0/Linux failures? Looking at the output below (from
>> http://tinyurl.com/6mnzn), it seems to me that the test was attempted
>> to be linked against *both* GCC and Intel runtimes:
>
> I think the problem is that the compiler is running on a platform
> where the version of glibc is unsupported (too recent). I have come
> across the same problem myself. After much research I found the only
> workaround was to rename strol in the compilers libcprts.a This is a
> big hack but gets things compiling.  I have a already manipulated
> libcprts.a but it is 1M. I can post it to whoever needs it however.

Martin, should we go down this route, or should I mark up the
failures as expected with a corresponding note?

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering