From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-07 02:33:15
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> It would be appreciated if the maintainers of the following libraries
> took care of the corresponding issues listed in
tools/build/v2/doc/architecture.html: unlinked file
File removed. It's pretty old and will only confuse users.
tools/build/v2/doc/extending.html: unlinked file
File removed, all content is in BoostBook already.
tools/build/v2/index.html: broken link:
boost-build.tar.bz2, broken link: boost-build.zip,
broken link: doc/html/bbv2.installation.html,
broken link: doc/html/index.html,
These are BoostBook links. I've modified them to point to ../../../doc... so
that they work in complete Boost package, as opposed to standalone
Boost.Build package. But I think it's still be necessary to run the link
checker on the packages Boost tree, in case I've done something wrong or
there are some BoostBook changes.
broken link: doc/issues.html,
That's commented out link. I've removed it anyway.
broken link: nttp://news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.build
tools/build/v2/test/test_system.html: unlinked file
I'll take care of this one later, because I need to move it to BoostBook and
it will take time.
These are to BoostBook docs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk