Re: [boost] uBLAS results for vc7.1 too good to be true?

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-11 11:08:21

Bronek Kozicki writes:
> http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/numeric-ublas_release.html 
> (http://tinyurl.com/3vmlv ) Almost all results for vc7.1 are marked 
> "unexpected success". 

... and if you follow the cell's link, you'll see the following:

    Notes
    
     This test case used to fail in the reference ("last-known-good") release. 

> I think this compiler is around for enough long 
> time to mark these results as "just expected" success?

I used to plan to get rid of all "used-to-fail-in-the-LKG-release" dark green 
cells just before producing the final "release reports", but I'm not so sure 
now. It may be a good thing if we let users see how much things have improved.

--
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering