From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-13 08:01:26
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> As I understand it (which is not in *any* way authoritative) if the
> authors give permission for me to use the code under the GPL (which I
> think amounts to dual-licensing it to me as Boost and GPL?) then I am
> free to modify their original code, still under the GPL. The modified
> version then has my copyright (which I assign to the FSF) _and_ the
> original authors copyright statements on.
> Alexander, whatever your views on whether the GPL can be upheld, you
> seem to be pretty knowledgable on copyright issues, have I got it even
> partly right?
I think you got it right. The only question is how much of original
and derivative (colloquially) work "deserves" the copyright
protection. I bet that in the case of SmartPtr, when honestly
applied, filtration step of the AFC test will entirely eliminate
copyright protection for any decent implementation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk