From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-16 05:16:55
> Sounds good. "Assertion":
> "The existence of _any_ 64-bit integer type implies the definedness of
> [u]int64_t and in this case the macro BOOST_NO_INT64_T is not set."
> Correct ?
> Indeed. Unfortunately I have to overload for all intrinsic types ;-( ,
> that's why I ask these strange questions.
> (After reading your following post and 'is_integral.hpp', I figure
> working around it with 'is_integral' - although unhandy in my particular
> situation - may be the lesser of two evils...)
OK understood, in that case you need to go down the is_integral route.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk