From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 01:55:39
What actions (if any) are the regression testers expect to do to handle
I presume if any are required that the boost-testing list will be so notified.
At Tuesday 2004-10-19 09:58, you wrote:
>Martin Wille wrote:
>>Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>I'll post another notice right before the branching, and yet another one
>>>when it's complete.
>>Shouldn't the Boost.Test failures be fixed first?
>It's never been the case that all bugs must be fixed before branching. In
>fact, I'm a little surprised that we waited this long before
>branching. Of course, it would be much better if the codebase were kept
>much cleaner ongoingly.
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk