Boost logo

Boost :

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 01:55:39

What actions (if any) are the regression testers expect to do to handle
this "branch"?
I presume if any are required that the boost-testing list will be so notified.

At Tuesday 2004-10-19 09:58, you wrote:
>Martin Wille wrote:
>>Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>I'll post another notice right before the branching, and yet another one
>>>when it's complete.
>>Shouldn't the Boost.Test failures be fixed first?
>It's never been the case that all bugs must be fixed before branching. In
>fact, I'm a little surprised that we waited this long before
>branching. Of course, it would be much better if the codebase were kept
>much cleaner ongoingly.
>Dave Abrahams
>Boost Consulting
>Unsubscribe & other changes:

Victor A. Wagner Jr.
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at