From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 08:01:50
Peter Dimov wrote:
>> Yes. But it's possible to have standalone "normalization" function,
>> and still use default normalized representation for the string class.
> Thereby assuming that all users need to pay for normalization (twice) on
> every comparison?
Noway, of course.
> Or maybe you are arguing that the string should always be kept in a
> particular normalized form?
That's what I meant.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk