[boost] Re: Re: Re: Any interest in adding unicode support to boost?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 08:01:50

Peter Dimov wrote:

>> Yes. But it's possible to have standalone "normalization" function,
>> and still use default normalized representation for the string class.
> 
> Thereby assuming that all users need to pay for normalization (twice) on
> every comparison?

Noway, of course.

> Or maybe you are arguing that the string should always be kept in a
> particular normalized form?

That's what I meant.

- Volodya