From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 13:42:41
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Perhaps having a one-size-fits-all unicode_string might be a nice
> default, as long as users who care about encoding and canonical form
> have other types (template + policies?) with knobs they can twiddle.
Right. My original point was that the advanced users don't really need a
class (or a class template with policies.) They need algorithms that operate
on sequences of char*_t.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk