Re: [boost] Re: Any interest in adding unicode support to boost?

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 13:42:41

Eric Niebler wrote:
> Perhaps having a one-size-fits-all unicode_string might be a nice
> default, as long as users who care about encoding and canonical form
> have other types (template + policies?) with knobs they can twiddle.

Right. My original point was that the advanced users don't really need a 
class (or a class template with policies.) They need algorithms that operate 
on sequences of char*_t.