RE: [boost] Re: Any interest in adding unicode support to boost?

From: Stefan Seefeld (sseefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 15:00:35

> From: Peter Dimov [mailto:pdimov_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: October 20, 2004 15:52

> To paraphrase, unnecessary parameterization is the root of most evil 
> nowadays. Parameters are a liability, not an asset. 

I'd sign that any day !

However, the primary goal behind my XML wrapper library (which, by the way,
I
already discussed here on the boost list to see whether there was enough
interest into a general purpose C++ API for dealing with XML...) was to
define an API, and to provide a sample implementation as a proof-of-concept.

The fact that this particular implementation I'v been using is based on
utf-8 
should be transparent (though accessible).

Regards,
                Stefan