From: Rogier van Dalen (rogiervd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 03:32:51
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:02:34 -0700, Eric Niebler
> No fair bringing religion into this. ;-) I'll repeat what I said before
> -- this would be an unfortunate design, and you'll hear about it from
> your users. If you force people to do their bit twiddling in
> vector<char*_t>, then you impose an extra allocation and a copy to get
> it into a unicode::string, and most people won't bother.
What frequent use cases do you see where people will want to change
bits rather than work with characters?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk