From: Neal D. Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-29 06:21:22
Darren Cook wrote:
>>>Did you look on Boost circular_buffer (currently in Files section)?
>>>It is not yet oficially released but should get into 1.33.
>> You may find cycle_iterator useful. I have uploaded to files area:
> I had a look but wasn't sure where it fits in - is it an alternative to
Yes. The behaviour of circular_buffer and cycle_iterator are not the same.
I grabbed the latest circular_buffer.zip from FILES, but there is no doc.
AFAICT, the main difference is that cycle_iterator is meant to be a fixed
size, while I believe circular_buffer is variable size up to a maximum?
cycle_iterator (and Ring) are also smaller and simpler code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk