From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-29 23:08:07
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:12:41 +0900, Darren Cook <darren_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > >- This opinion is probably not shared with others, but I'd prefer the
> > >library to be independent from the Boost Thread library. The dependency
> > >feels kind of the wrong way around.
> > ...
> > But a dependency on any thread library is likely to throw cold water on
> > my use.
> Same here.
There is no dependency on Boost.Threads unless BOOST_HAS_THREADS is defined.
Is there a need for another option e.g. BOOST_LOG_HAS_THREADS that
could be used to en/disable the dependency in *otherwise*
-- Caleb Epstein caleb.epstein_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk