[boost] Re: boost::function feature request?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-04 18:24:36

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Of course f = t; is merely a shorthand way of spelling f =
> boost::lambda::constant(t), but a dependency on lambda isn't always
> desirable.
>
> Thoughts?

By the same token, one could argue that this functionality ought to
be pushed into boost::bind.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com