Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-05 06:16:33

> It has been suggested to me that it would be better (for other reasons) to
> mark individual member functions as exported rather than marking whole
> classes. Would that also help in this situation? I haven't looked closely
> yet, but if the individual member functions of the thread classes are
> exported then this warning may no longer be generated.
> Would there be any problems with changing to this approach?

Is it supported by all compilers that use __declspec(dllexport)? What
happens on 64-bit platforms, do we have different class layouts for exported
and non-exported classes (like we used to on Win-16)? I'm assuming that
there is some kind of logic for the warning being issued in the first place,
or maybe not?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at