From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-05 09:15:59
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:01:55 -0500, Doug Gregor wrote
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 8:44 AM, Erik Wien wrote:
> > Doug Gregor wrote:
> >> Interestingly enough, at the Boost workshop at OOPSLA last week we
> >> discussed doing this for anyone bringing their first library up for
> >> review. A mentorship program, so to speak, where seasoned Boosters
> >> would
> >> help navigate the review process in the hope of bringing more
> >> libraries up
> >> to formal review.
> > Interesting. Would such a "mentor" be available throughout the
> > development
> > process, or would this only be for the last push towards the review?
> I'm not sure... it probably depends on the mentor:submitter ratio,
> but longer would be better. The moderators will probably discuss the
> specifics off-list and we'll come to the group with a fully-baked
> proposal in the near future.
I think that to do much good, the mentor has to be available throughout the
development, but I agree with Doug that we need to work out specifics and
recruit willing volunteers. And, of course, experienced boosters with free
time are a fairly limited commodity -- so we have to be careful.
BTW, my full summary of the workshop results should be posted in the next day
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk