Re: [boost] Re: logging lib, v1.3

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-06 01:37:28

At Friday 2004-11-05 02:29, you wrote:
>John Torjo wrote:
>
>>Finally, have had some time to update the logging lib. Get it from:
>>http://www.torjo.com/ (of course, it comes packed with docs)
>
>
>Just a quick thought that came to my mind...
>
>Did you consider using the syntax 'BOOST_LOG(dbg, "message" << foobar);' 
>instead of 'BOOST_LOG(dbg) << "message" << foobar;'?
>
>While I think the syntax you use looks far nicer, we ususally need the 
>ability to be able to compile away the logging calls completely and this 
>only can be done with the first form.

a point considered in detail in  "Effecient C++" by Bulka & Mayhew

>Markus
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"