From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-07 18:46:57
At 05:42 PM 11/7/2004, Jared McIntyre wrote:
>I'm guessing from reading through the 1.32 tarball docs that the this
>release will still have some libraries that are not under the Boost 1
>license. Is this the case?
Yes, but John Maddock put in a great deal of effort contacting boost
contributors, and so we are in far better shape with this release than the
> If so, is there a definitive list of
It identifies every file with a potential license or copyright problem.
That allows you pretty quickly to see what the license status is of any
library you are interested in.