Re: [boost] License and new version

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-07 18:46:57

At 05:42 PM 11/7/2004, Jared McIntyre wrote:

 >I'm guessing from reading through the 1.32 tarball docs that the this
 >release will still have some libraries that are not under the Boost 1
 >license.   Is this the case?

Yes, but John Maddock put in a great deal of effort contacting boost 
contributors, and so we are in far better shape with this release than the 
last one.

 > If so, is there a definitive list of
 >these projects?

See http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/license_report.html

It identifies every file with a potential license or copyright problem. 
That allows you pretty quickly to see what the license status is of any 
library you are interested in.

--Beman