From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-07 18:46:57
At 05:42 PM 11/7/2004, Jared McIntyre wrote:
>I'm guessing from reading through the 1.32 tarball docs that the this
>release will still have some libraries that are not under the Boost 1
>license. Is this the case?
Yes, but John Maddock put in a great deal of effort contacting boost
contributors, and so we are in far better shape with this release than the
> If so, is there a definitive list of
It identifies every file with a potential license or copyright problem.
That allows you pretty quickly to see what the license status is of any
library you are interested in.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk