Boost logo

Boost :

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-08 07:23:05

Martin Wille wrote:

> I don't think gcc 3.1 is something one has to worry
> about too much. I doubt it is much in use. (Either
> people still stick to the even more broken gcc 3.1

that should read 2.95, not 3.1, of course.

> or they use gcc 3.3 or even 3.4)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at