|
|
Boost : |
From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-08 07:23:05
Martin Wille wrote:
> I don't think gcc 3.1 is something one has to worry
> about too much. I doubt it is much in use. (Either
> people still stick to the even more broken gcc 3.1
that should read 2.95, not 3.1, of course.
> or they use gcc 3.3 or even 3.4)
m
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk