|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-11 10:05:08
"Neal D. Becker" <nbecker_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I was struggling with const correctness and iterator adaptors. At
> first I was using iterator_facade. I found it difficult to get
> dereference to work correctly.
What were you trying to do and what was the problem?
> After changing to iterator_adaptor I got things working. I'm
> wondering if the approach I used is "correct".
>
> I include the whole class here, because it isn't really very big.
>
> I was using a Ring class which contains an iterator, which is
> cycle_iterator<std::vector<Complex>::iterator>.
>
> If a Ring const& is passed
Passed to what, as which argument?
> I had problems with dereference.
>
> The changes I made to cycle_iterator fix this were:
>
> 1) Add templated conversion constructor to cycle_iterator, to allow
> implicit conversion of cycle_iterator -> const cycle_iterator.
Okay.
> 2) Include both
>
> reference dereference()
>
> and
>
> const reference dereference() const
That seems very wrong. Generally an iterator's constness should not
affect what you get when you dereference it, and a reference type is
never changed by adding "const" to it.
> (likewise for operator[])
likewise.
> So, do my changes constitute a "correct" approach to making interoperable
> iterators using boost::iterator_adaptor?
Did you read
http://www.boost.org/libs/iterator/doc/iterator_facade.html#a-constant-node-iterator
and
http://www.boost.org/libs/iterator/doc/iterator_facade.html#interoperability
?
>
> #ifndef cycle_iterator_H
> #define cycle_iterator_H
>
> #include <boost/iterator/iterator_adaptor.hpp>
> #include <iterator>
>
> namespace boost {
>
> //! This is a cycle iterator that does keep track of wraparound.
> template<typename BaseIterator, typename offset_t>
> class cycle_iterator : public boost::iterator_adaptor<cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, offset_t>,
> BaseIterator
> >
> {
> public:
> typedef typename boost::iterator_adaptor<cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, offset_t>,
> BaseIterator
> > super_t;
>
> typedef typename super_t::difference_type difference_type;
> typedef typename super_t::value_type value_type;
You don't need the above typedef
> typedef typename super_t::reference reference;
>
> explicit cycle_iterator() {}
>
> explicit cycle_iterator (BaseIterator const& _b, BaseIterator const& _e, offset_t offset=0) :
> base(_b), size (_e-_b) {
If you want to support forward/bidirectional iterators you might want
to use distance instead of operator-
> SetPos (offset);
> }
>
> template <typename OtherBase>
> cycle_iterator (cycle_iterator<OtherBase,offset_t> const& other) :
> base (other.base),
> size (other.size),
> position (other.position),
> wrap (other.wrap)
> {}
>
> private:
> friend class boost::iterator_core_access;
>
>
> void increment () {
> ++position;
> if (position >= size) {
> ++wrap;
Tabs don't travel well ;-)
> position -= size;
> }
> }
>
> void decrement () {
> --position;
> if (position < 0) {
> --wrap;
> position += size;
> }
> }
>
> void SetPos (offset_t newpos) {
> position = newpos % size;
> wrap = newpos / size;
> if (position < 0) {
> --wrap;
> position += size;
> }
> }
>
> void advance (difference_type n) {
> offset_t newpos = realposition() + n;
> SetPos (newpos);
> }
>
> difference_type
> distance_to (cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, offset_t> const& y)
> const {
If you really want interop., you should templatize this one so you
can compare const/non-const cycle iterators.
> if (size == 0)
> return 0;
>
> else {
> offset_t pos1 = realposition();
> offset_t pos2 = y.realposition();
> return -(pos1 - pos2);
Pretty convoluted, but I guess that's okay. pos2-pos1 would be simpler.
> }
> }
>
> bool equal (cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, offset_t> const& y)
> const {
Likewise, you should templatize this one, as described in the tutorial.
> return distance_to (y) == 0;
> }
>
> reference dereference() { return *(base + position); }
>
> const reference dereference() const { return *(base + position); }
>
> offset_t PositiveMod (offset_t x) const {
> offset_t y = x % size;
> if (y < 0)
> y += size;
> return y;
> }
>
> public:
>
> reference operator[] (difference_type n) { return *(base +
> PositiveMod (position + n)); }
What's wrong with the operator[] supplied by iterator_adaptor?
>
> const reference operator[] (difference_type n) const { return *(base +PositiveMod (position + n)); }
>
> offset_t offset() const { return position; }
>
> offset_t realposition () const {
> return position + wrap * size;
> }
>
>
> // private:
>
> BaseIterator base;
> offset_t size;
> offset_t position;
> offset_t wrap;
> };
>
> template<typename offset_t, typename BaseIterator>
> cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, offset_t> make_cycle_iterator(BaseIterator b, BaseIterator e, offset_t offset=0) {
> return cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, offset_t> (b, e, offset);
> }
>
> template<typename BaseIterator>
> cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, int> make_cycle_iterator(BaseIterator b, BaseIterator e, int offset=0) {
> return cycle_iterator<BaseIterator, int> (b, e, offset);
> }
>
> } //namespace boost
>
> #endif
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk