[boost] Re: [Review] Named parameters library

From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-13 18:10:19

Peter Dimov wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
> 
>>
>> This coupling could be avoided by using an overloaded operator to
>> combine the arguments, for example:
>>
>>     f(slew(.799) | name("z"));
> 
> 
> I've been using essentially the same technique, except that I chose & as 
> a combiner operator. | isn't bad, too.

But it still looks considerably worse than:

   f(slew = 0.799, name = "z");

And you lose the positional meaning.

-- 
Daniel Wallin