[boost] Re: Re: Boost Iterable Range Library update (v1.5)

From: Neal D. Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-16 07:28:02

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

> "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:cn3o25$ml6$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> | Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> |
> | > "Neal D. Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> 
> | > | In this case, I'd say it's a net loss.
> | >
> | > Sorry, could you elaborate on what the loss is? Using a new iterable
> | > range concept we can say
> | >
> | > sub_range<const in_cont> r( in );
> | > for( ; r; ++r ) { ... }
> | >
> |
> | I'm confused.  We are talking about http://www.torjo.com/rangelib/?  I
> | can't find any mention of the above "sub_range" in the zip I grabbed
> | from that site.
> 
> yeah, sorry. sub_range is in boost.range, not in John's lib. But it dosn't
> change anything, just think of
> irange or ctange.
> 
> So again, what is the "net loss"?
> 

If the example you show above actually worked, that would be great.