From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-16 13:37:38
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Martin Wille writes:
>>I'm afraid this could be caused by an update to the libc on my box.
>>Some of the intel libraries explicitely refer to __ctype_b@@GLIBC_2.0
>>However, on my box there's only GLIBC_2.3 stuff.
(I tried to install glibc 2.0.6 in the meantime. However, that
failed miserably due to syntax errors. Interestingly, glibc
2.0.6. recommends gcc 220.127.116.11 which I outright refuse to
> That's a pity.
But I'd say if we cannot fix it, it'd be less misleading
> if we took the configuration out of the tests.
I agree. I'll remove intel-7.1 from my set of toolsets.
May be somebody else
> can test Intel 7.1 on Linux?
I start to doubt it'd make sense to support 7.1 after the
1.32 release. If the compiler requires such ancient stuff
then it will get abandoned quickly by developers.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk