From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-16 20:07:17
Daniel James <daniel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Sorry, another feature request. Would it be possible/a good idea to
> add a way to get the type of a named parameter?
Certainly it's possible. Not sure if it's a good idea. Is there a
use case? Some people are complaining that the library is already
heavy artillery where none is needed.
> It's possible to call a template function which will then know the
> type, but it seems like using this library already requires enough
> forwarding functions.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk