Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 13:02:32

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

> "Daniel Wallin" <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:cnidaq$tim$
>>IMO, a runtime error here is just not acceptable.
> I disagree. I don't see compile-time error as an advantage here, but only a
> burden. I very much prefer to be able to write

I'm sorry but that just doesn't make sense... You are basically saying
that, straight C++, if you have...

   void foo(int arg1, int arg2);

And I use it as...


That C++ should give me a runtime error instead of the compiler doing
the syntax checking.

Are you serious?

-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. -
-- rrivera/ - grafik/ - 102708583/icq

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at