From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 13:02:32
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Daniel Wallin" <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>IMO, a runtime error here is just not acceptable.
> I disagree. I don't see compile-time error as an advantage here, but only a
> burden. I very much prefer to be able to write
I'm sorry but that just doesn't make sense... You are basically saying
that, straight C++, if you have...
void foo(int arg1, int arg2);
And I use it as...
That C++ should give me a runtime error instead of the compiler doing
the syntax checking.
Are you serious?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk