Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-20 15:45:36

At 01:07 AM 11/20/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

>2. Even if it is well-recognized, I think it would be terrible to be
> tied down to that logo forever just because people currently
> recognize it: it's not a very good logo. I mean that it doesn't
> do what a logo should. I remember what the Spirit logo looks like
> better than I remember the Boost logo, and I've had way more
> exposure to the latter.

I guess it is a matter of personal taste. To me the current logo is much
more memorable, and does exactly what we want it to do - tie the Boost name
to C++ in a graphical form that is more visual than a pure text


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at