[boost] Re: Ref documenation point of clarity

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-21 22:23:13

"Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:

> This may be seen as a nitpick by I think the generalized one-line
> explanation for 'ref', as well as the text in the 'ref' introduction should
> say "passing reference parameters to generic functions" rather than "passing
> references to generic functions".

If I was going to add a word there, it would be "arguments," not
"parameters."  

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com