From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 17:25:10
Rich Johnson <rjohnson_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> I find this one too static, compared to Dave's attempts.
>>> It does have the sense of solidity that some have asked for,
>>> but I'd rather have a more dynamic feel (which reflects, I think,
>>> more accurately what boost is. Much of boost is not for the
>> Thanks. Actually I thought that Joaquín's design was plenty dynamic
>> and better than mine on simplicity grounds. I do agree about the ring
>> and the ++. Put a little white gap between the rocket and the ring at
>> the intersection, and you've got your "C."
> Hmm... two little puffs of exhaust could be +'s and the third could be
> a 'C'-ring. It's kinda' cartoony, but fun.
Or you could make the +es into four-pointed stars.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk