[boost] Re: Logo substance. [was: Re: Logo... and page design.]

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 17:25:10

Rich Johnson <rjohnson_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>> I find this one too static, compared to Dave's attempts.
>>> It does have the sense of solidity that some have asked for,
>>> but I'd rather have a more dynamic feel (which reflects, I think,
>>> more accurately what boost is. Much of boost is not for the
>>> faint-hearted.)
>>
>> Thanks.  Actually I thought that Joaquín's design was plenty dynamic
>> and better than mine on simplicity grounds.  I do agree about the ring
>> and the ++.  Put a little white gap between the rocket and the ring at
>> the intersection, and you've got your "C."
>>
> Hmm... two little puffs of exhaust could be +'s and the third could be
> a 'C'-ring.  It's kinda' cartoony, but fun.

Or you could make the +es into four-pointed stars.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com