From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 20:21:01
David Abrahams wrote:
> Here are a couple of possibilities, along with some "widgets" that
> were inspired by the ">>" marks in one of Rene's recent pages.
I realize that you are trying to fit the 's' in with '++', but I feel
like the ++ is too big, and that the 's' shrinks too much. I wonder if
more of a 3-D approach with overlapping or interlacing would be
promising? Or perhaps even impossible overlapping, a la Escher?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk